Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Toolkit.Socialnetwork.Health
updated beliefs a little esp. schools.
m finish tweaking the universality section
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Colored box|icon=Tiny_logo_x1.png|background-title-color=#36c|title=Precaution|title-color=#fff|background-content-color=#eaf3ff|content=This website is not to be considered medical advice under any circumstances. 
If you, or anyone you know, are experiencing suicidal ideations, please visit the [https://www.iasp.info/suicidalthoughts/ International Association for Suicide Prevention]
}}
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
This toolkit exists to make '''''freely available''''' and '''''accessible''''' the theory, practical Implementation, and research in the field of [[Social Network Health]].
This toolkit exists to make '''''freely available''''' and '''''accessible''''' the theory, practical implementation guidelines, and most prominent research in the field of [[Social Network Health]].


== Major Sections ==
For anyone who wants to use a Social Network Health approach to improve the health of their community, this toolkit will provide the essential theory, which should be understood first, and basic implementation information to provide enough of the scope and precautionary information to evaluate training materials. 


[[Theory]] - How do Social Network Health approaches to preventative mental health care improve lives and communities, and fit into a holistic system of health care?
Use the major sections below to navigate, and please read through the context section below if you are ever in doubt of the context of this toolkit.  [https://groups.google.com/a/socialnetwork.health/g/discuss/ We are easy to reach.]


[[Practical Implementation]] - What are fundamentals of practical implementation of a social network health approach?
== Major Sections ==


[[Research Library]] - Primary resources, seminal research, educational video explainers, and links to external resources.
{{Colored box|icon=Tiny_logo_x1.png|background-title-color=#36c|title=Sections|title-color=#fff|background-content-color=#eaf3ff|content=
'''''The Major Sections of this toolkit can be navigated via the hamburger menu: '''''


== Notes: ==
* [[Theory]] - The Key Findings in Social Network Health and their context.
* [[Practical Implementation]] - The fundamentals of practical implementation of a social network health approach.
* [[Research Library]] - '''TBD''' Primary resources, seminal research, educational video explainers, and links to external resources.


'''Note to Readers''': this is an extremely early version of a site meant to describe Social Network Health approaches.  DO NOT use this as an implementation guide and do not quote this toolkit anywhere until this note is removed.  Once we reach alpha stage in July 2024, we will update this note and release the entire toolkit under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en creative commons attribution non-commercial no-derivatives license] only.  As much as we would like to allow derivatives, the precautionary language on the Social Network Health site, and all mental health resources, is critical to maintain in it’s precise form. We will be looking into less restrictive licenses in the future. 
}}
 
== Context ==
Note on page name: This is the Theoretical Overview so "Main Page" has been replaced, unless we want to have overview and context here, and then link out to the three main sections: Theoretical Orientation, Practical Implementation, and Research Library 
 
Crisis - TBD: Humanity is experiencing a '''[[Global crisis in mental health|crisis in mental health]]'''.  Note: that probably doesn't belong on this page - unless we want another page on context. 


Note: the summary could be a prelude to a section on the 14 points, or could be renamed and replaced entirely
=== Project Status ===
== Testing PDF:Cite ==
The current status of this Toolkit is: '''Alpha'''


Test of PDF:Cite using file on wikivisor.
''That means we are testing this Toolkit and seeking peer review. This toolkit should currently be useful, informative, and not misleading. However, this site should not yet be relied upon alone to evaluate an approach, training system, or program.''
{{PDFCite
|file=https://wikivisor.com/w/images/3/34/Peer_adult_network_structure_and_suicide_attempts_in_38_high_schools.pdf
|citation=(b) Mean number of friends named, and (c) Mean coreness. Table 1 describes school-level variables and each school’s network structure relative to all others (e.g., percent isolates ranged 0–6.45% across the 38 schools)
|page=3
|color=33eeff
}} <code>passed</code>


Another test of PDF:Cite for a file stored in google drive (anyone with the link can view): {{PDFCite|file=https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TBPi41hbQfA_Y7-29CAmojNHOSAZRfBC/view?usp=sharing|citation=Schools whose selected peer leaders had
What we have done to date:
higher overlap with theoretical ones had greater difusion of intervention media and peer communication.|page=3}} <code>failed</code> ''no direct access to the file''


Another test using wayback machine pdf:{{PDFCite|file=https://web.archive.org/web/20170811233131/http://actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/sites/actionallianceforsuicideprevention.org/files/Developmental%20Approach%20to%20Prevent.pdf|citation=In conclusion, effective upstream prevention programs have been identified that modify risk and protective factors for adolescent suicide, and key knowledge breakthroughs can jump-start progress in realizing the suicide prevention potential of specific strategies.|page=1}} <code>failed</code> ''no direct access to the file''
* We have filmed and interviewed the most prominent research team in the field, and dozens of school administrators, teachers, counselors, students and education professionals.  
* We have enumerated the key findings in theory, and added references and video support for each. NOTE: we have only added one researcher interview, and one research paper, to test the content and format of this site - so we have dozens more interviews and papers to add.
* We have enumerated the basic precautions and scope of practical implementation


More tests:
=== Project History ===
This project was conceived in 2021 to document successful implementations in Social Network Health.  [https://socialnetwork.health The Social Network Health project] has been filming teachers, students, administrators, counselors, researchers and others since early 2022 - that is ongoing as of this writing.  In the process, we have collected research and observed common language, practices, and wisdom that is best compiled and presented in this living, mixed media format.  We will be launching the first useful release of this site in 2024.


{{PDFCite|file=https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/ppt/CERC_Psychology_of_a_Crisis.pdf|citation=Changing our beliefs during a crisis or emergency may be difficult. Beliefs are often held very strongly and not easily altered.|page=3}} <code>passed</code>
To learn more about the team, mission, and values of the Social Network Health Project, see [https://socialnetwork.health/about the about page on our main website.]


{{PDFCite|file=https://theactionalliance.org/sites/default/files/action_alliance_marketing_handout_2.pdf|citation=Ensuring public messaging about suicide and suicide prevention is accurate, safe, helpful, and effective|page=2}} <code>passed</code>
=== Non-commercial Project ===
Note that this is a charitable, non-commercial project - you can't buy anything here or on our main site, and we won't recommend anything for purchase.  However, we will review and profile materials and training professionals on our main site in interviews, blog posts, and videos.


== Placeholder for Beliefs and Contexty Things ==
=== Active Research Area ===
 
=== Active Research ===
The Network Health Approach describes tools and methods that are under active study, development, and use.
The Network Health Approach describes tools and methods that are under active study, development, and use.


Line 52: Line 53:


=== Schools First ===
=== Schools First ===
Throughout this toolkit, we will assume the context of a school.  We are focused on helping there because the need for preventative solutions and research is strong.  However, this approach has been proven effective in other contexts such as in the United States Air Force, Police departments, and other contexts you can learn more about on the research page.
Throughout this toolkit, we will typically assume the context of a school.  We are focused on helping there because the need for preventative solutions and research is strong.  However, this approach has been proven effective in other contexts such as in the United States Air Force, Police departments, and other contexts you can learn more about on the research page.
 
Schools are a priority because of their vulnerable, high-potential populations, but also because they have become community hubs and therefore the second and third places in the terminology of Oldenburg.  Their increasing importance in modern society as community infrastructure warrants our full attention.  Schools can even pull family (the first place) into community by organizing family oriented activities and relationship building.


School have become community hubs and therefore the second and third places in the terminology of Oldenburg.  Their increasing importance in modern society as community infrastructure warrants our full attention.  Schools can even pull family (the first place) into community by organizing family oriented activities and relationship building.
For that reason, we will use language that is appropriate for schools - we will make research language accessible to schools specifically.


=== Universality of the Approach ===
=== Universality of the Approach ===
Programs are developed from approaches. Ecological validity is one part of the Social Network Health Approach that demands that a program is developed specifically and uniquely for a community - that’s what makes this approach so broadly applicable. This contention is supported by researched implementation across a breadth of communities.
We believe that a high-level Social Network Health approach that is universally useful for all communities can be defined, but such an approach must not dictate implementation details.  
 
Certainly, any remotely universal approach cannot look like the implementation of what is commonly sold as a "program" by most professional development companies.


A network health approach to preventative care builds individual and community protective factors and social norms.  Network health approaches that address these processes, such as maximizing youth-adult connections schoolwide and heightening influence of youth with coping, create more protective schools.  
'''Approaches develop programs''' 
 
An "approach" refers to a broad strategy or framework that offers evidence-based principles, logical reasoning, guidelines, and wisdom. It serves as a foundation for developing specific interventions and guiding overall practices. In contrast, a "program" is the practical application of an approach, akin to a detailed recipe that specifies how to implement those principles in real-world settings. While programs can effectively translate an approach into action, their repeated use may sometimes lead to a focus on the procedures rather than the underlying logic, wisdom, and evidence that inspired the approach in the first place. 
 
Ecological validity is one finding of Social Network Health research that demands that a program is developed specifically and uniquely for a community -  . This contention is supported by researched implementation across a breadth of communities.   
 
==== Programs must yield to culture ====
Programs are developed from approaches and ideally should dissolve into strong cultural values and practices - long after the programs are forgotten, the approach and cultural practices can stay resident in a community.
 
A network health approach to preventative care attempts to make individual and community protective factors and social norms a part of everyday culture.  Network health approaches that address these processes and can only maintain their universality if they are co-implemented by the community they are developed in.


=== Historical Context ===
=== Historical Context ===
The history of preventative mental health care is beyond the scope of this wiki, but it is worth arguing that the characteristics of this approach are different than what has been created in the societies of most of the world over the last 100 years, but they are not that different from what existed and still does exist in most cultures in the more distant past. Not an immediate focus, but the fact that research has taken humanity full circle to rediscovered excellence is notable and in some cases relevant.   
The history of preventative mental health care is beyond the scope of this wiki, but it is worth arguing that the characteristics of Social Network Health approaches differ from how mental health has been approached in modern societies most of the world over for the last 100 years, but they are not that different from what existed and still does exist in most cultures in the more distant past. The fact that research has taken humanity full circle to rediscovered excellence is notable and in some cases relevant.  Some discussion of this is relevant to understanding practical implementation roadblocks, so this history is expanded on in the [[Practical Implementation|implementation]] page. 
 
=== Medical Model v. Strengths model ===
We are attempting to outline Social Network Health in the context of what we call a "strengths model".  The "medical model" of care requires identification of a weakness to begin recommending treatment. In mental health care, some issues have no strong correlates that can be identified as weaknesses early on. Interestingly, there are correlates that can be identified as risk factors in communities that are much stronger indicators of future risk, and more readily identifiable, than individual risk factors.[citation needed] In some cases, strengths-based models that seek to identify strengths of individuals and communities have been shown to be more effective in reducing risk factors than a weakness-based medical model. Treating a community preventatively withy a strengths based-model can also be done without isolating individuals as weak links, separating them from connections. Instead, a strengths based preventative care program identifies strengths and integrates individuals into broader communities.
 
 
{{Colored box
| icon = Tiny_logo_x1.png
| background-title-color = #36c
| title = Notable Works In Progress (WIP)
| title-color = #fff
| background-content-color = #eaf3ff
| content = ==Other Works In Progress Here==


(It is probably well worth discussing the resource trap that educational institutions get into in which prevention cannot be funded - this is a cycle that repeats throughout history and there should be a rail to prevent it from happening in the future)
These pages are notable and we are actively seeking feedback on them, but they are less complete, mostly idea-stage, and shouldn't be used or quoted until we remove them from this section, or they are completed and removed from this WIP section.


=== Medical Model v. Strengths model ===
* [[SNH Maturity Model]] - Super experimental idea-stage page that begins the thought experiment to determine the maturity of a communities effort to improve Social Network Health.
The medical model of care requires identification of a weakness to begin recommending treatment. In mental health care, some issues have no strong correlates that can be identified as weaknesses early on. Interestingly, there are correlates that can be identified as risk factors in communities that are much stronger indicators of future risk, and more readily identifiable, than individual risk factors. In some cases, strengths-based models that seek to identify strengths of individuals and communities have been shown to be more effective in reducing risk factors than a weakness-based medical model. Treating a community preventatively withy a strengths based-model can also be done without isolating individuals as weak links, separating them from connections. Instead, a strengths based preventative care program identifies strengths and integrates individuals into broader communities.


In the parlance of Social Emotional Learning in US schools there Tiers - Tier 1 (prevention-based) comes before Tier 3 (isolation-based) because it is, colloquially, terrible to have to isolate people - generally, Tier 1 is the success case and Tier 3 is the last line of defense for individuals who need it. This is appropriate prioritization from the perspective of a social network health approach. In practical implementation, however, far fewer communities put as many resources into effective Tier 1 programming as Tier 3.
* [[Protective Factors]] - Straightforward page where we will collect summaries, research quotes, video shorts on various protective factors.


TBD - We could make a matrix of all the characteristics of programs out there and see where this approach fits - that might be overkill to start with, but it would be useful to those who are trying to find the right approach in a sea of approaches.
* [[Stream Strategy Modeling Resources]] - We are curating and assessing models of integrated systems of health care that model resource allocation strategies and expected outcomes.
}}

Latest revision as of 13:02, 2 September 2024

Precaution

This website is not to be considered medical advice under any circumstances.

If you, or anyone you know, are experiencing suicidal ideations, please visit the International Association for Suicide Prevention

Introduction

This toolkit exists to make freely available and accessible the theory, practical implementation guidelines, and most prominent research in the field of Social Network Health.

For anyone who wants to use a Social Network Health approach to improve the health of their community, this toolkit will provide the essential theory, which should be understood first, and basic implementation information to provide enough of the scope and precautionary information to evaluate training materials.

Use the major sections below to navigate, and please read through the context section below if you are ever in doubt of the context of this toolkit. We are easy to reach.

Major Sections

Sections

The Major Sections of this toolkit can be navigated via the hamburger menu:

  • Theory - The Key Findings in Social Network Health and their context.
  • Practical Implementation - The fundamentals of practical implementation of a social network health approach.
  • Research Library - TBD Primary resources, seminal research, educational video explainers, and links to external resources.

Context

Project Status

The current status of this Toolkit is: Alpha

That means we are testing this Toolkit and seeking peer review. This toolkit should currently be useful, informative, and not misleading. However, this site should not yet be relied upon alone to evaluate an approach, training system, or program.

What we have done to date:

  • We have filmed and interviewed the most prominent research team in the field, and dozens of school administrators, teachers, counselors, students and education professionals.
  • We have enumerated the key findings in theory, and added references and video support for each. NOTE: we have only added one researcher interview, and one research paper, to test the content and format of this site - so we have dozens more interviews and papers to add.
  • We have enumerated the basic precautions and scope of practical implementation

Project History

This project was conceived in 2021 to document successful implementations in Social Network Health. The Social Network Health project has been filming teachers, students, administrators, counselors, researchers and others since early 2022 - that is ongoing as of this writing. In the process, we have collected research and observed common language, practices, and wisdom that is best compiled and presented in this living, mixed media format. We will be launching the first useful release of this site in 2024.

To learn more about the team, mission, and values of the Social Network Health Project, see the about page on our main website.

Non-commercial Project

Note that this is a charitable, non-commercial project - you can't buy anything here or on our main site, and we won't recommend anything for purchase. However, we will review and profile materials and training professionals on our main site in interviews, blog posts, and videos.

Active Research Area

The Network Health Approach describes tools and methods that are under active study, development, and use.

This means that this toolkit will be updated as new research dictates, and, most importantly the version history will reflect changes accurately.

To ensure that you have the latest information, you can check the most recent update date on any page in this wiki, view and read the full version history, see when it was last peer-reviewed, sign up for updates to this toolkit, join our discussion group, and apply to become an editor.

We will update this with new research as it develops.  We have a research page where new contexts in which these tools can be used will be described as the tools are applied, researched, and tested within them.

Schools First

Throughout this toolkit, we will typically assume the context of a school.  We are focused on helping there because the need for preventative solutions and research is strong.  However, this approach has been proven effective in other contexts such as in the United States Air Force, Police departments, and other contexts you can learn more about on the research page.

Schools are a priority because of their vulnerable, high-potential populations, but also because they have become community hubs and therefore the second and third places in the terminology of Oldenburg. Their increasing importance in modern society as community infrastructure warrants our full attention. Schools can even pull family (the first place) into community by organizing family oriented activities and relationship building.

For that reason, we will use language that is appropriate for schools - we will make research language accessible to schools specifically.

Universality of the Approach

We believe that a high-level Social Network Health approach that is universally useful for all communities can be defined, but such an approach must not dictate implementation details.

Certainly, any remotely universal approach cannot look like the implementation of what is commonly sold as a "program" by most professional development companies.

Approaches develop programs

An "approach" refers to a broad strategy or framework that offers evidence-based principles, logical reasoning, guidelines, and wisdom. It serves as a foundation for developing specific interventions and guiding overall practices. In contrast, a "program" is the practical application of an approach, akin to a detailed recipe that specifies how to implement those principles in real-world settings. While programs can effectively translate an approach into action, their repeated use may sometimes lead to a focus on the procedures rather than the underlying logic, wisdom, and evidence that inspired the approach in the first place.

Ecological validity is one finding of Social Network Health research that demands that a program is developed specifically and uniquely for a community - . This contention is supported by researched implementation across a breadth of communities.

Programs must yield to culture

Programs are developed from approaches and ideally should dissolve into strong cultural values and practices - long after the programs are forgotten, the approach and cultural practices can stay resident in a community.

A network health approach to preventative care attempts to make individual and community protective factors and social norms a part of everyday culture.  Network health approaches that address these processes and can only maintain their universality if they are co-implemented by the community they are developed in.

Historical Context

The history of preventative mental health care is beyond the scope of this wiki, but it is worth arguing that the characteristics of Social Network Health approaches differ from how mental health has been approached in modern societies most of the world over for the last 100 years, but they are not that different from what existed and still does exist in most cultures in the more distant past. The fact that research has taken humanity full circle to rediscovered excellence is notable and in some cases relevant. Some discussion of this is relevant to understanding practical implementation roadblocks, so this history is expanded on in the implementation page.

Medical Model v. Strengths model

We are attempting to outline Social Network Health in the context of what we call a "strengths model". The "medical model" of care requires identification of a weakness to begin recommending treatment. In mental health care, some issues have no strong correlates that can be identified as weaknesses early on. Interestingly, there are correlates that can be identified as risk factors in communities that are much stronger indicators of future risk, and more readily identifiable, than individual risk factors.[citation needed] In some cases, strengths-based models that seek to identify strengths of individuals and communities have been shown to be more effective in reducing risk factors than a weakness-based medical model. Treating a community preventatively withy a strengths based-model can also be done without isolating individuals as weak links, separating them from connections. Instead, a strengths based preventative care program identifies strengths and integrates individuals into broader communities.


Notable Works In Progress (WIP)

Other Works In Progress Here

These pages are notable and we are actively seeking feedback on them, but they are less complete, mostly idea-stage, and shouldn't be used or quoted until we remove them from this section, or they are completed and removed from this WIP section.

  • SNH Maturity Model - Super experimental idea-stage page that begins the thought experiment to determine the maturity of a communities effort to improve Social Network Health.
  • Protective Factors - Straightforward page where we will collect summaries, research quotes, video shorts on various protective factors.
  • Stream Strategy Modeling Resources - We are curating and assessing models of integrated systems of health care that model resource allocation strategies and expected outcomes.